2017英语四级阅读模拟练习题及答案四十一

　　A new analysis of federal money that public schools receive for low-income students shows that a record number of the nation’s school districts will receive less in the coming academic year than they did for theone just ended.

　　For the 2005-2006 school year, spending under the Department of Education’s Title I program, which helps low-achieving children in high-poverty areas, is increasing by 3.2 percent, to $12.6 billion. But because of population shifts, growing numbers of poor children, newer census data and complex formulas that determine how the money is divided, more than two-thirds of the districts, or 8,843, will not receive as much financing as before.

　　The analysis, based on data from the department, was made by the Center on Education Policy, a group advocating for public schools. A similar study by the group last year showed that 55 percent of the schools would receive less money than they did in the previous year.

　　“It's an alarming number,” said Tom Fagan, a former department official who conducted the analysis. “It’s clear that the amount of overall increase is not keeping pace with the number of poor kids.”

　　Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman, defended the spending levels for Title I，saying, “President Bush and Congress have invested record amounts of funding to help the nation’s neediest students.”

　　But Mr. Fagan said the increasing number of districts that are losing money is making it harder for the schools to meet the goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act, the Bush administration's signature education program, which measures progress through annual tests in math, reading and science. That is giving critics of the program more grounds to accuse the administration of not sufficiently financing the program while demanding greater results.

　　Title I provides the largest component of financing for No Child Left Behind.

　　“The federal government is concentrating more money in fewer districts," said John F. Jennings, the president and chief executive of the Center on Education Policy. “It means there is lots of anger and lots of tension. They're asking us to do more and more with less and less.”

　　练习题：

　　Choose correct answers to the question:

　　1.As it is indicated in the passage, the new analysis _____.

　　A.studied the federal money spent on low-income students

　　B.aimed at promoting the establishment of more public schools

　　C.showed that about half the schools would receive less money

　　D.was conducted by the Department of Education’s Title I program

　　2.Which of the following factors does NOT lead to the result that more than two-thirds of thedistricts will get more poorly financed?

　　A.People often move from one place to another.

　　B.There are more children from poor families.

　　C.The way of distributing money has changed.

　　D.Spending under the Title I program decreased.

　　3.Susan Aspey looks at the funding by the government with _______.

　　A.criticism

　　B.consent

　　C.Indifference

　　D.expectation

　　4.According to Tom Fagan, ______.

　　A.the government has done its best to finance the poor children

　　B.the goals of No Child Left Behind Act are difficult to realize

　　C.the way of measuring progress by annual tests should be changed

　　D.the Bush government shouldn't have approved the Title I program

　　5.When the government concentrates more money in fewer districts, _____.

　　A.more poor children will get benefited

　　B.more public schools will have to be closed

　　C.it will arouse more people’s dissatisfaction

　　D.No Child Left Behind Act will be realized sooner