JSP 中Hibernate实现映射枚举类型
问题:
Java BO类Gender是枚举类型,想在数据库中存成字符串格式,如何编写hbm.xml?
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
public enum Gender{
UNKNOWN( "Unknown" ),
MALE( "Male" ),
FEMALE( "Female" );
private String key;
private Gender( final String key) {
this .key = key;
}
public getGender(String key) {
for (Gender gender : Gender.values()) {
if (key.euqals(gender.getKey()))
return gender;
}
throw new NoSuchElementException(key);
}
}
|
使用UserType:
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
public class GenderUserType implements UserType {
private static int [] typeList = { Types.VARCHAR};
/*
* Return the SQL type codes for the columns mapped by this type.
* The codes are defined on java.sql.Types. */
/**设置和Gender类的sex属性对应的字段的SQL类型 */
public int[] sqlTypes() {
return typeList;
}
/*The class returned by nullSafeGet().*/
/** 设置GenderUserType所映射的Java类:Gender类 */
public Class returnedClass() {
return Gender.class;
}
/** 指明Gender类是不可变类 */
public boolean isMutable() {
return false;
}
/*
* Return a deep copy of the persistent state, stopping at entities and at
* collections. It is not necessary to copy immutable objects, or null
* values, in which case it is safe to simply return the argument.
*/
/** 返回Gender对象的快照,由于Gender类是不可变类, 因此直接将参数代表的Gender对象返回 */
public Object deepCopy(Object value) {
return (Gender)value;
}
/** 比较一个Gender对象是否和它的快照相同 */
public boolean equals(Object x, Object y) {
//由于内存中只可能有两个静态常量Gender实例,
//因此可以直接按内存地址比较
return (x == y);
}
public int hashCode(Object x){
return x.hashCode();
}
/*
* Retrieve an instance of the mapped class from a JDBC resultset. Implementors
* should handle possibility of null values.
*/
/** 从JDBC ResultSet中读取key,然后返回相应的Gender实例 */
public Object nullSafeGet(ResultSet rs, String[] names, Object owner)
throws HibernateException, SQLException{
//从ResultSet中读取key
String sex = (String) Hibernate.STRING.nullSafeGet(rs, names[0]);
if (sex == null) { return null; }
//按照性别查找匹配的Gender实例
try {
return Gender.getGender(sex);
}catch (java.util.NoSuchElementException e) {
throw new HibernateException("Bad Gender value: " + sex, e);
}
}
/*
* Write an instance of the mapped class to a prepared statement. Implementors
* should handle possibility of null values.
* A multi-column type should be written to parameters starting from index.
*/
/** 把Gender对象的key属性添加到JDBC PreparedStatement中 */
public void nullSafeSet(PreparedStatement st, Object value, int index)
throws HibernateException, SQLException{
String sex = null;
if (value != null)
sex = ((Gender)value).getKey();
Hibernate.String.nullSafeSet(st, sex, index);
}
/*
* Reconstruct an object from the cacheable representation. At the very least this
* method should perform a deep copy if the type is mutable. (optional operation)
*/
public Object assemble(Serializable cached, Object owner){
return cached;
}
/*
* Transform the object into its cacheable representation. At the very least this
* method should perform a deep copy if the type is mutable. That may not be enough
* for some implementations, however; for example, associations must be cached as
* identifier values. (optional operation)
*/
public Serializable disassemble(Object value) {
return (Serializable)value;
}
/*
* During merge, replace the existing (target) value in the entity we are merging to
* with a new (original) value from the detached entity we are merging. For immutable
* objects, or null values, it is safe to simply return the first parameter. For
* mutable objects, it is safe to return a copy of the first parameter. For objects
* with component values, it might make sense to recursively replace component values.
*/
public Object replace(Object original, Object target, Object owner){
return original;
}
}
|
然后再hbm.xml中定义映射关系:
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
< hibernate-mapping package = "" default-lazy = "true" default-cascade = "save-update,merge,persist" >
< typedef name = "Gender" class = "com.alpha.hibernate.GenderUserType" >
< property name = "gender" type = "Gender" >
< column name = "GENDER" not-null = "true" >
< CODE> |
延伸:
为每个枚举类型定义一个UserType是比较麻烦的,可以定义一个抽象类。
例如扩展下例即可适用于所有保存为index的枚举类型
?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
|
public abstract class OrdinalEnumUserType |
jsp复习资料汇总
[JSP]2017年1月24日asp教程编程辅导汇总
[ASP]2016年12月2日JSP快速入门教程汇总
[JSP]2016年12月2日jsp基本用法和命令汇总
[JSP]2016年10月3日ASP编码教程:如何实现/使用缓存
[ASP]2015年4月15日