Should old buildings be replaced by newbuildings?

　　I think the old buildings should be preserved. Ihave two reasons to support my opinion. Firstly, oldbuildings are precious property of human being. We will lose those valuable historical buildingspermanently if we don't preserve them. Once ahistorical building is destroyed, we can never restoreit. Secondly, old buildings are a symbol of a city anda valuable tourist resource. Think about theForbidden City and The Summer Palace in Beijing. They are the relics of the city and carryinggreat historical and cultural information. Every year they attract visitors from all over the world, which generates profound tourist income.

　　More information

　　1. Old buildings attract people.

　　America’s downtown revivals suggest that people like old buildings. Whether the feeling ispatriotic, homey, warm, or reassuring, older architecture tends to fit the bill. Regardless ofhow they actually spend their lives, Americans prefer to picture themselves living around oldbuildings. Some eyes glaze over when preservationists talk about “historic building stock,” butwhat they really mean is a community's inventory of old buildings ready to fulfill new uses.

　　2. Old buildings are reminders of a city’s culture and complexity.

　　By seeing historic buildings — whether related to something famous or recognizablydramatic—tourists and longtime residents are able to witness the aesthetic and culturalhistory of an area. Just as banks prefer to build stately, old-fashioned facades, even whenlocated in commercial malls, a city needs old buildings to maintain a sense of permanency andheritage.