2018年5月19日雅思大作文预测：教育与政府

　　题型2 话题分类：教育类 属性：一级重点

　　参考题目1

　　制定课程靠政府还是老师The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers...

　　制定课程靠政府还是老师The subjects and lesson contents are decided by the authorities such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. Do you agree or disagree?

　　题型

　　同意与否型

　　解题思路

　　政府制定的必要性1：推广和普及基础教育。举例，必须在全国范围推广关于国语和社会公共法律的课程，这样能让每一个孩子都成为合格的社会公民，能够阅读，也能够守法。而个体老师则很可能安装自己的意愿来教导学生，他们可能教的是当地的语言，当地的宗教规则，这些和整个社会是不兼容的。政府制定的必要性2：政府掌握着社会就业的数据，它知道社会需要哪些专业，不需要哪些专业。所以政府来制定教育的话，能保证学生学到的知识和技能是社会工作真正需要的。老师制定的必要性：老师从来都战斗在教育第一线，他们更有经验，也更能了解学生的需求。举例，老师可以灵活的来改变和调整上课的内容和方法，目的是让每一个学生都能掌握这节课的知识。而政府则不不可能预测到这些具体学习上的问题。

　　范文

　　Who should shoulder the responsibilities of determining the contents of subjects of school education? The government or the preceptors? This issue has been a heated social issue in debate. Personally, I believe the combination of them might be the best solution, and reasons will be expounded as below. Firstly, the government should make efforts in popularization of basic education, which ensures every child can grow up into a regular citizen. For example, it is very wise that the central government forces every elementary school to teach some compulsory subjects like official languages and state’s laws, for the general knowledge can shape all children of new generations, especially the ones in remote or religious areas, into standard people with common languages skills to read news and data in media, as well as law-abiding consciousness to distinguish the right from the wrong. On the contrary, a single teacher is untruthful. In many cases, a local teacher in a religious region prefers instilling local culture elements into minds of children, such as indigenous language exclusive from the national information system, or local culture-based rules that might be incompatible with and even violate the national laws. Another reason why the government should make authoritative decisions in contents of subjects in university stems from a concern of social employment. Obviously, the government is the only social entity that grasps overall data of social employment changes, for example, what subject is eagerly required in companies today, and what subject is too out-of-date to suit the social trend. On this level, it is reasonable to give the government adequate power to decide and adjust plans of education, which can ensure university students master proper professional knowledge, skills and technologies that fully match the practical demands of current social jobs. That is to say, under a government-guided university system, the graduates would be less likely trapped into the unemployment. Nonetheless, the importance of teachers should never be ignored, for the reason that they are frontline staffs, who accumulate abundant teaching experience and a deep understanding of the practical needs of individual students. In fact, studying is a very personal activity, because there is a huge difference in intelligence, talents, and interests among students. In other words, according to feedbacks from students, teachers should have high-level flexibility and adaptability in deciding contents and paces of a particular class, for the purpose of satisfying the studying effectiveness of every individual. The government, however, fails to predict these detailed difficulties and challenges of students in class, so that a unified teaching plan might be too fast or too slow for them. In conclusion, the government and every single pedagogue have unique strengths and weakness in education planning. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, the wise measure should be letting them work together to make a perfect resolution.(467字)