2018年5月19日雅思大作文预测：同意与否

　　参考题目4

　　富国是否该帮助穷国 Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should p...

　　富国是否该帮助穷国 Rich countries provide financial aid to poor countries but this aid has little effect, therefore rich countries should provide other types of help. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

　　题型

　　同意与否型

　　解题思路

　　管自己的好处： 1. 国家的税收和资源都是基于国内大众，所以国家必须首先对国内问题负责，否则大众会认为遭到忽略和歧视，他们会推翻政府。 2. 国外问题太多，缺乏监管和法律，那些爱心捐款和物资有可能流入国外官僚的腰包，而没有起到救助国外穷人的初始目的。 3. 我们国内社会需要用钱的方面都已经太多，钱用自家都不够，捐助国外只会引起国内弱势群体的愤怒，增加社会犯罪类。管他人的好处： 1. 很多国外的社会问题都是过去我们国家的某些行动导致的，如战争和侵略，所以我们因该对国外的贫穷负责。 2. 很多国外的问题最终会影响到我们的社会，比如说索马里海盗对于西方海运的威胁。 3. 很多国际问题是不分国界的，比如说国外的环境污染和疾病会通过自然渠道流入我们国内。

　　范文

　　What kinds of relief from rich countries should be given priority in terms of supporting developing countries? Some people think the best resolution of this issue is simply money. Others, however, refute that other auxiliary measures, instead of finance, are a wiser decision. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view, and the supporting reasons will be presented as below. Firstly, financial aids allow a poor country to build up an effective government by paying salaries of governmental personnel without delay. With stable income, most officials would be satisfied and motivated to be fully in charge of social technical, executive and supervisory positions, thus lifting the community out of street violence and crimes. Besides, financial injection helps to restore the banking system. Accordingly, what the capital input brings includes vibrant industry and business, ever-increasing job opportunities and tax revenue for public welfare. Another reason for supporting financial aids is that money is always a favored kind of donation, because it gives recipients in poor countries a high flexibility to buy what they really lack. In fact, practical needs are always variable and unpredictable in different countries, peoples and times, so that it is very likely that the common physical goods endowed from rich countries may not precisely suit demands of local regions. Therefore, straight money support is indispensable, and its universal effectiveness is always superior to any other goods-based donation. However, financial aids do not come without risks, and one of them is about their misuse. Obviously, in too many developing countries lacking democracy, public supervision, or accountability and transparency in government operation, there is a high possibility that the money might be appropriated for personal sake or even flow into the pocket of bureaucrats--corruption in short, expectedly. Consequently, the final application of financial support would depart from its initial charitable purpose, and it will make social poverty worse, not better. Moreover, when it comes to healthy and sustainable growth, there are more to require for a poor country than just buying stuffs by money. Specifically, the acquirement of core factors that have lasting and fundamental impacts on the society, such as qualified teachers, doctors, lawyers and scientists, cannot be achieved by buying, but rather by systematic training and teaching. For example, professional teams containing experts in all kinds of fields from science to medication, from law to social work, should be sent in poor countries for the purpose of educating their future talents. In conclusion, financial aids are always the prerequisite for economy resurgence. To a larger extent, however, money is very confined and even risky, and other applicable assistances, especially the ones related to human resources, should be introduced into impoverished countries.(446字)