2018年5月19日雅思大作文预测：多问题型

　　参考题目2

　　高等教育的学费支付办法 Higher education is funded in several ways: all costs of higher education are paid by the government; all costs are pa...

　　高等教育的学费支付办法 Higher education is funded in several ways: all costs of higher education are paid by the government; all costs are paid by the student; all costs are paid by students with a government loan which must be repaid after graduation. What are the benefits of these ways and which one is the best?

　　题型

　　多问题型

　　解题思路

　　1. 第一种方案的好处：大学学费全部由政府承担能普及大学教育，这能让每一个年轻人都获取专业知识，技能，以及法律观念，最终能提高社会生产力，并且让社会变得更文明和守法。 2. 第二种方案的好处：大学学费完全由学生负担能限制大学的学生数量，这确保了大学教育的质量，比如说更少的师生比率，更小的班级上课，以及一个安静的校园。 3. 第三种方案的好处：提供学生学费贷款能为年轻人提供一条进入大学的途径。同时，还贷款的压力为这些年轻人提供了动力来努力学习。这样他们才能在毕业后找到好的工作来还钱。

　　范文

　　Who should shoulder the responsibility of paying for the higher education, the government or the student? Three possible ways for this social issue are proposed. Personally, I believe the best resolution is the third one that allows a student to borrow the loan from the government and repay it after graduation, and my reasons will be displayed as below. The main benefit from the first plan is about the improvement of qualities among the public. The full payment of government for schooling fees makes university education universally available to all individuals, both rich and poor. That is to say, every citizen can be well educated and equipped with professional knowledge, skills, advanced technologies, as well as the concepts about social laws, rules and morality. With these abilities and virtues, these graduates will enhance the social productivity, the creativity in jobs, and make the community gentle, charitable, self-disciplined and law-abiding as well. The second plan primarily increases the quality of university education. Obviously, paying for the higher education at students’ own expense is an ideal method to limit the number of students. That is to say, the atmosphere of the campus is quiet, peaceful and safer, students can attend small-size classes helping them keep focused on the studying, and they also can obtain instructions from professors immediately, in terms of a small faculty-student ratio. Lastly, the third way is favorable for the growth of students. For one thing, the loan from the government can eradicate the financial barriers in the access to the university education, as well as making students away from the concern of taking part-time jobs for making money in college life. For another, the stress of repaying the loan drives them to make most efforts in studying, because this is the only way for them to get good jobs with decent salaries in the future which will enable them to pay the money back after graduation. In my view, the third plan is the best of all, for the reason that it not only integrates the merits of the two former methods, but also motivates students to study and work harder for the repayment. In comparison, there are some demerits from the first and second plans. For example, in terms of the fact that total costs of all universities are incredibly high, the heavy burden of the government would lead to the shortage of budgets on other more urgent social problems, like public health care and environment pollution. Oppositely, if students are required to afford all the fees of the high-level education, many of them will abandon the opportunity and choose to be uneducated. Consequently, an increase in unemployment and social crimes among the young generation can be expected.(451字)